Table of Contents
In the 1957 film “12 Angry Men Leadership”, a group of jurors must decide the fate of a young man accused of murder. The film examines the power dynamics and decision-making process within a group, and it offers valuable lessons for businessmen and leaders.
Many people view the movie “12 Angry Men Leadership” as a lesson in effective group dynamics and collective decision-making. But few realize that the same principles that apply to a jury also hold true for leadership. Leaders need to navigate tensions and build consensus among their team members in any organization.
In this blog post, we’ll discuss the key takeaways from “12 Angry Men Leadership” that can help you become a more effective leader and help your team reach consensus more quickly and easily.
In the Movie – “12 Angry Men Leadership”
Leadership is not about authority, and it’s all in how you lead. A leader without followers has no power – but when the people who are meant to follow do just that and more than they’re asked of them by someone with a position higher up on an organizational ladder or some other formality like this can be powerful indeed.
The movie “12 Angry Men Leadership” is about a group of men who have each other’s backs to solve the murder case against an 18-year-old boy from a lower-class family.
Juror Eight was a true leader on the jury, and he showed incredible patience in resolving conflicts. Despite being criticized by others for his decisions throughout this process- especially after taking over when another member had to step down due to illness – Juror Eight kept an even temperament while still making critical leadership moves that helped move the group towards what you know.
Juror Eight took two huge risks in the service of his purpose, first when he called for secret ballots and said that if there were only one holdout, they would vote guilty; secondly, by making Lee J. Cobb lost control due to anger, so everyone could see how people say things without realizing what their words mean sometimes.
The “12 Angry Men Leadership Lessons
Here I’m going to explain The “12 Angry Men Leadership Lessons:
The character of Henry Fonda was a voting “guilty” when the rest 11 jurors also voted that way. But he saw what would happen if they were all found guilty – an innocent boy could be executed for something he didn’t do. So instead, with the difficult path, which meant standing against his fellow citizens but changing their behavior without respecting opinions or laws outlined in trial proceedings like this one- Henry decided to go forward even though it wasn’t easy considering how much pressure everyone else had put on him as well.
Try coming out of your comfort zone when you’re in a discussion. That’s right – even if it means taking on some tough conversations or standing up for what is right.
In the movie “12 Angry Men”, a jury watches a trial. They are all discussing whether or not they should find someone guilty of murder regarding some other case outcomes that happened earlier on during their discussion time together as well as what could happen if this person was found innocent instead so it’s important for them not only come up with strong arguments but stay calm and collected too.
The tone of voice is the way to make your point. If you want someone else’s attention, don’t be aggressive. Use a softer and more persuasive approach that will work for any situation.
The short-tempered and aggressive people might not get their way in the end. It’s just not worth it to be so angry or upset about something that doesn’t go your way because of all these five little words: assertiveness, the right tone of voice, and putting arguments with conviction. They’re what will make you stand out from other candidates.
You can also check out our other related article Components of Leadership:
Empathize with the Team
From the beginning, Henry Fonda’s character tries to walk into thoughts and feelings that he believes are inside another person’s shoes. It must have been like for him as an immigrant coming from Ireland into America where there were already many different cultures present at that period – some good sounding ones (like Irish) and others not so much such as slavery or Native American slavery, which was common practice back then. Instead of rushing potentially being prejudiced against those who looked differently than himself, maybe try seeing things differently.
When you try to understand why people are saying what they’re saying, it will allow for a more fulfilling life. You can walk into their shoes and feel how decisions affect them personally and see the bigger picture.
Empathizing makes you better at seeing things from other’s perspectives because you take on board all that entails – which means no one ever feels alone in their struggles with themselves or others around them.
The jurors gathered. Eleven of them just wanted the trial over with so they could go home early on voting for guilty without offering anything insight into what happened in a court other than their initial choices at roll call. They didn’t want to invest any time and intellectual efforts. It seemed easier to them than trying hard after after-the-fact by thinking deeply about everything that needed consideration or investigating further options available, even if only subconsciously.
You can’t just jump into a conversation with someone and expect them to respond. The first step is figuring out the stakes of that discussion or conversation, so you know how best to approach it.
The choice to have a different opinion when the odds are 11:1 can be difficult, but it’s worth fighting for. Fonda delivered an outstanding performance depicting how he chose his life path in opposition to those around him who preferred being sheeple to individuals with analytical abilities like him. Don’t let yourself fall into this category.
The fear of being ridiculed or rejected is a common reason for not putting forward one’s views. But remember to stay true to what you believe and never back down. You might have an idea that no matter how many people laugh at first sight of it, as long as they’re willing enough to think outside their box, then there will come more than enough time where these same individuals can see value in your perspective instead and maybe even join up.
Fonda realized that trying to force someone’s views on them is a losing battle. His subtle techniques consisted of nudge-nudging others into voting ‘not guilty’ without ever making an overt statement about what needed to be done, and it worked.
The reason why this works? Well, you are all subject to your own set of complicated emotions when interacting with other humans, but they also have desires for resistivity change which often conflicts with one another, making any conversation challenging at best.
Leadership is all about the softer skills, like understanding and connecting with people. It’s important to have a clear vision and adjust it as you go along so that your team can succeed in their goals together.
It’s important to find ways of getting others involved in the process instead of pushing them. A good leader understands how people work and when appropriate use subtle techniques rather than going all out with an upfront approach.
Juror 8 was the only person who voted against guilt in this group. He stood out from everyone else by remaining seated throughout most jury discussions and rarely raising his hand to indicate yes or no votes on anything presented before them during our observation period.
Healthy debate requires conflict. To reach the best idea, people need to disagree and argue their points in an open environment where they can learn from one another’s arguments without fear of violence or censorship. But this doesn’t always happen naturally. Companies teach their employees how to be more productive dissenters by encouraging healthy discussion skills through training sessions that promote intellectual honesty while providing tools for success on the job.
Respect everyone’s Opinion
Juror 8 showed respect for the other jurors even when they were sarcastic and critical. He never gave up on their Opinion and listened to everything they had to say with a smile on his face.
When Juror 8 voted non-guilty, it seemed as though some of the other jurors were annoyed by his decision. Even during their discussion on how to proceed with this case, he faced snarky comments from them, and one even called him an ignorant man. But surprisingly enough, when you look at what happened next, you see that he listened to their views politely despite all odds.
The leader must create an environment where people respect each other, irrespective of job titles and hierarchies. Every person in the organization should firmly believe every other individual has inherent value to them, which they want to do great work with, just like Juror 8.
Juror 8 was a leader who saw himself as just another peer. He didn’t consider his position in life to be superior or smarter than anyone else, which made him humble enough for others on the jury panel not only to take notice but respect him too. Likewise, a good leader must treat everyone as their peers.
When the 12th Juror asked if they could each take up a minute or two and talk about their thoughts on trial, everyone at this table could share what was on their mind. The Foreman agreed with the fellow juror that these discussions might help them become more informed when making decisions later in life, so he supported whatever decision would allow all some say over how you felt afterward.
Leaders have a responsibility to make sure that all voices are heard, even if they don’t perform functions. Be mindful of the quieter people who may feel intimidated or fear reactions from others in their company; these individuals probably carry important information with them, which could play an integral role when making decisions.
Here are some important FAQs:
The reasonable doubt argument is very strong because it forces all jury members to weigh their options truly. It means they have reached an agreement quickly without giving much thought or investigation into either side’s case. However, in most cases, this will be seen as faulty logic since only one person voted guilty while everyone else wanted more time (and likely would’ve found out information that could’ve changed things).
Leadership is about inspiring people to do things they never thought possible. A good leader will always have integrity, accountability, and empathy as their top priorities; while maintaining morale with a humility-resilience complex (which includes) visioning future success for those following in one’s footsteps–it takes both strength & soft skills).
Leaders influence their team members through clear goals and objectives, motivation to succeed, and providing them with direction. Without a leader that motivates followers for it all to work out successfully, then there will be no success in the group.
The “12 Angry Men” is a great movie to learn leadership lessons from. The film highlights the importance of choosing the right over easy, watching out for tone, empathizing with the team, and giving time to make important decisions. It also shows how having a different perspective can be helpful and pushing others and obliging dissenters. Finally, it emphasizes the importance of respecting everyone’s Opinion and giving voice to the quiet one. If you want to be an effective leader, watch this movie and apply its lessons.